Refund Alternative

Refund remedy and extension of free upgrade to my Financial Abundance Program

If you paid an administrative facilitation fee for Mortgagefree, Natural Justice and or Sovereign Reserve I offer you a free upgrade to my Financial Abundance Program at no extra cost at any time.

I review it here on this short video

Why?

Because many of you want to see how the members that have already upgraded get on.

Is that reasonable?

Yes, and this is why I am providing you with an indefinite opportunity to upgrade for free at any time in the future.

Many of you have submitted questions; I detail them below with my answers.

Is there an entitlement for a refund?

As outlined in previous correspondence, customers that paid for self-directed administrative services have no entitlement for a refund.
However, I have good news for you as I have found a way that may pay you the equivalent of a refund.

My offer is outlined below “Alternative Refund Remedy”

Are refunds available for Mortgagefree, Natural Justice, and Sovereign Reserve processes?
No
Why are refunds not available?

There are three reasons why refunds are not available:

  1. You paid for an administrative service to draft and send documents to mortgage, loan, credit providers, or HMRC under your instruction, which means you self-directed the process.
  2. No promise was made by the administrative company you paid or on its behalf relating to the success of the administrative process.
  3. The administrative company did not breach the contract. As a result, you received the service you paid for.
Are there any circumstances in which a refund is due?
Only if a breach of contract is identified and proven by you.
What does the law say about this?
Are there other reasons that you are not providing refunds?

Yes, I have committed to deliver my Financial Abundance Program to all members that have upgraded and to fund the development of “The World’s Biggest Freedom Community”.

I will uphold the trust my members have put in me and not fund refunds that are not due. Funding refunds would jeopardise my ability to honour my commitment to my MATRIXFREEDOM members.

Were promises of success made for the Mortgagefree, Natural Justice and/or Sovereign Reserve processes?
No promises were made that the processes would succeed.
Were any track record claims made?
What statements were made about the track record for Mortgagefree?
Statements were made that 100% of the mortgages reviewed by the Mortgagefree process were void at law.
What statements were made about the track record of Sovereign Reserve?
Statements were made that the process would discharge credit cards, loans and taxes on the Private ledger. The method may affect the debtor’s credit score on the Public ledger at the credit score agencies.
What statements were made about cleaning credit scores up at the credit score agencies?
Statements were made that there were ways the debtor could clean up an affected credit score.
What caused Iain Clifford’s confidence in the Mortgagefree, Natural Justice and Sovereign Reserve processes?
To answer this, I outline the background below

Mortgagefree, Natural Justice and Sovereign Reserve Background

Listen to my interview on the Wakeup podcast here

I became a paid member of YouAndYourCash (YAYC) in August 2019.

The content at YAYC appeared to be offered by Simon Goldberg and Andrew Jackman.

I purchased various courses from YAYC on Commercial Liens (the process underlies Mortgagefree and Natural Justice) and Accepted for Value AV4 (the process underlies Sovereign Reserve).

I attended a Commercial Lien seminar in November 2019, presented by Simon Goldberg and Andrew Jackman.

From the YAYC courses and seminar, numerous representations were given to me by Andrew Jackman and Simon Goldberg of their successful track record with Commercial Liens and Accepted for Value AV4.

Winston Shrout

It is apparent that Andrew Jackman and Simon Goldberg learned the Commercial Lien and Accepted for Value processes from Winston Shrout. Winston Shrout is serving a ten-year prison sentence commencing in 2017.

www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2019/11/12/tax-fugitive-back-in-custody-after-months-on-the-run/

Quatloos Reviews of Simon Goldberg YAYC

Alternative Refund Remedy

If you do not want to upgrade to my Financial Abundance Program now but would like your money back, I have a potential remedy

My Offer to You

I will share 100% of any award in damages that I receive proportionately to how much you paid in administrative fees for the Mortgagefree and Natural Justice and/or Sovereign Reserve self-directed administrative processes, from two law suits.

Iain Clifford v Andrew Jackman & Simon Goldberg

Your Mortgagfree, Natural Justice and or Sovereign Reserve problems were caused by Andrew Jackman and Simon Goldberg

MY REQUIREMENTS COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT

Due to the serious nature of the offences I will seek relief from the courts at their earliest convenience.

CONVICTION

I require the maximum sentence via a conviction of the First Defendant for the tort of Unlawful Means Conspiracy and Dishonesty, Fraud by False Representation, Fraud by Abuse of Position, Failure to Disclose Information, Obtaining Services Dishonestly.

I require the maximum sentence via a conviction of the Second Defendant for the tort of Unlawful Means Conspiracy and Dishonesty, Fraud by False Representation, Fraud by Abuse of Position, Failure to Disclose Information.

DAMAGES / COMPENSATION

I require the First Defendant and Second Defendant (Defendants) to pay me damages of £25,120,000.

If the Defendants are unable to finance my damages from customary sources of assets or insurance coverage, grant me a £25,000,000 Lien over Andrew JACKMAN Cestui Que Vie trust and Simon John GOLDBERG Cestui Que Vie trust and be ordered to execute a suitable Financing Statement under Uniform Commercial Code UCC1 UCC3 as the debtors to Iain Clifford STAMP and not in any way obstruct the liquidation of the Lien at the US Department of Treasury as a creditor of Andrew JACKMAN and Simon John GOLDBERG.

SUMMARY OF CASE

The Defendants used me as their patsy to recruit distressed individuals they could profit from via their commercial arrangements with a barrister they ran a business with.

The Defendants knew or should have known that Private Law, Commercial Liens and Accepted for Value processes do not work and cause injury to those that apply them to remedy their debt and court issues.

I have suffered considerable reputational and financial damage due to the Defendant’s misrepresentations.

The Second Defendant has tried to conceal his misrepresentations and unlawful means conspiracy with the First Defendant by setting up and running a criminal gang to harass me and undermine my Private Members Association and customer-directed administrative businesses via online Publications.

  • The First Defendant is Professionally Negligent.
  • The first Defendant breached his fiduciary obligations towards me and CQV Trustees.
  • The first Defendant breached his services contract with CQV Trustees.
  • The first and Second Defendants injured CQV Trustees and me via Conspiracy by Unlawful Means.

 

It should be noted that I can prove the Defendant’s acts unlawful in themselves and that they were done in pursuance of the conspiracy; the burden of justifying such acts passes to the Defendants.

Read about the case here:

Iain Clifford v Simon Goldberg, Simone Marshall & Mark Moxom

MY REQUIREMENTS COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT

Due to the serious nature of the offences and level of harassment I will seek relief from the courts at their earliest convenience

CONVICTION

I require the maximum sentence via a conviction of the first defendant, second defendant and third defendant for their part in organised crime as afforded to me under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

DAMAGES / COMPENSATION

Because the first defendant breached the statutory tort of harassment, I have suffered (a) injury to feelings, and I am entitled to claim compensation (higher end of medium vento band, circa £25,000), (b) financial loss and I am entitled to claim damage to my professional life and (c) claim damages equal to the amount of my personal financial support to my administrative companies and (d) injunctive relief.

Because the first defendant breached Art.5(1)(a) and (b) GDPR, I have suffered damage and distress and am entitled to compensation under Art.82 GDPR.

CEASE & DESIST INJUNCTION

I require the first defendant, second defendant and third defendant to immediately cease all publications on websites, Facebook, other social media channels, video channels and all other communication channels. I require any content supplied to the first defendant, second defendant and third defendants “Posse” or “Gang” to retrieve that data and instruct the “Posse” or “Gang” to remove and destroy the Data from all communication channels.

SUMMARY

The first defendant, second defendant and third defendant are not motivated by their concern for the public and cannot rely on the Truth or prevention of crime defence to justify their defamation, malicious falsehoods and “harassment via publication” against me, my team and MF-PMA members.

The first defendant, second defendant and third defendant are motivated by financial gain via unjust enrichment either via a takeover of MF-PMA, the provision of services to MF-PMF members by EtP and ETP Law Ltd, false crowdfunding of a nonsensical Private Criminal Prospection and referrals to their a barrister who may kickback referral fees.

The first defendant and second defendant have incited a “Posse” or “Gang” to harass me and my team for financial gain, this is organised crime.

There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by me, MF-PMA, or my administrative companies, as none exists.

The first defendant has much to hide related to his YAYC conduct and misrepresentations.

The second defendant is motivated and wants revenge for not getting paid what she wanted from me following her resignation.

The first defendant’s behaviour demonstrates a tremendous jealousy of what I have achieved in a short period of time.

I have suffered from a substantial reduction in revenues at my administrative companies and have personally funded the shortfalls.

I have suffered from anxiety due to the detrimental effect of the first defendant ‘s harassment and defamation against my team and me and the threat their “harassment via publication” poses to my ability to deliver the financial abundance program that MF-PMA members need and want. And, the reputational risk I will face if I have to close down MF-PMA and my administrative companies.

FlipBook here:

Acceptance of my Offer

If you want to accept my offer, you must do so by Monday, April 17th.

To accept my offer, send an email (add Fiona’s department email address) to this email address; you must provide your full name and address to register your interest.

This offer is open to all MATRIXFREEDOM members who have not upgraded to my Financial Abundance Program.

Should you register your interest and receive a share of the damages award, you will waive your right to a free upgrade to my Financial Abundance Program and will pay a membership fee if you want to do it in the future.

Five Problems and My Solutions

I recently recorded this short video, I’d love you to watch it

The Benefits of my Financial Abundance Program

Simone Marshall Empower The Earth - empowerthepeople.earth
Iain Clifford MATRIXFREEDOM Founder

“My three-stage financial abundance program does not require you to run a business or make investments, and it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme

Step 1, The correction of you’re standing or status 

Step 2, The protection of your assets 

Step 3, The return of your credit, that’s, your: digital bank payments, mortgage, loans, credit card face value and the creation of new credit to buy stuff 

I make it easy for you to become and stay financially abundant
via my fully facilitated financial abundance program that enables you to live a freedom lifestyle”

STEP OUT OF THE MATRIX TO FREEDOM IAIN CLIFFORD’S A TO Z PLAN